The first time I saw Henrik
Ibsen’s 1890 Hedda Gabler on stage
was at the Old Vic in London in 2012. And it’s hard to imagine a starker
contrast than between that traditionally staged and sumptuously costumed period
production and Bottoms Dream’s studio performance, which I attended at Theater 54 in New York the other week.
This Hedda Gabler (adapted by Caitlin White) is stripped down, with only
four characters, and performed in an intimate space with the audience
surrounding the performers. Sara Fay George, as Hedda, spends much of the play
writhing around the floor between scenes, playing with a pistol and acting out
the drama unfolding in her subconscious. The subtleties of Ibsen give way to
overt commentary on the lack of options open to the two women, Hedda and Thea (White),
which is difficult since the costuming (by Mary Rubi) suggests a later,
mid-twentieth-century setting.
The actors also seem inconsistent
in their approach, as if there are some who do
think they’re performing in a naturalistic production. Doug Durlcacher as
George plays the role of the clueless husband quite predictably but comes into
his own in the final scene as he and Thea reconstruct Eilert’s lost manuscript.
Nat Angstrom meanwhile does a good job in capturing the character’s charisma.
Director Kevin Hollenbeck has
chosen to put this Hedda Gabler in
conversation with another perennial nineteenth-century favourite—August
Strindberg’s 1888 Creditors (you can
read my review of another NYC production of Creditors
here). In this case, the two plays are performed back to back.
I only joined for the Ibsen play,
but it’s easy to see the parallels two. Strindberg actually accused Ibsen of plagiarism
in 1891, saying ‘Hedda Gabler is a bastard of Laura in The Father and
Tekla in Creditors’. Yet I couldn’t help but wonder whether it
might have been better to let the plays speak for themselves, rather than exposing
the parallels through the stylised sequences between scenes.
Do you know of any plays
currently being performed in New York that you think the Secret Victorianist
should see? Let me know—here, on Facebook or by tweeting
@SVictorianist.
No comments:
Post a Comment