The Historical Novel Society North America 2025 in Quotes: Part One

Yesterday I returned home from my third in-person Historical Novel Society North America (HNSNA) conference and my sixth HNS conference overall. This time the conference took place in Las Vegas! As I’ve done at the last few conferences, I’m sharing some of the favorite quotes I heard from fellow authors and a handful of publishing professionals over the last few days. A Part Two post will follow when I’ve had a chance to listen to the recordings of the sessions that I did not attend IRL.

Reporting from #HNS2025!

As usual, research continued to be a hot topic among the historical fiction community, with many writers sharing their go-to resources.  Jennifer S. Brown: “When I’m stuck, I dive into historical newspapers and magazines and see what was going on in the world.” Amanda Skenandore: “Old travel guides can be a treasure trove.” Judith Starkston: “Travel is the best kind of research.”

But Special Guest Silvia Moreno-Garcia urged us to consider oral history in addition to classic archival and library research: “Oral history paired with research can be a valuable foundation for your book.” She also shared that, “An erroneous memory can be more interesting than a real one. We must understand the lie and the truth inside it.” Spotlight Author Jeffrey Blount had a similar perspective: “The best writing advice I’ve ever received is, ‘listen.’”

Special Guest Fiona Davis also had helpful advice about some of the pitfalls of researching, suggesting we, “Keep meticulous records of the materials that helped shape your novel.” She also talked about how we can get lost in our research: “I can pack in too much research and have to strip it out.” Meanwhile, A.M. Stuart had a helpful reminder that we’re writing about historical fiction rather than history: “I’m not writing non-fiction. I make things up.”

Drafting was also a hot topic, with Kelsey James telling us, “It’s important to have momentum when drafting,” and Spotlight Author Sarah Penner keeping her advice straightforward: “Finish the book.” Hazel Gaynor touched on the software we’re using to draft: “I’ve heard that if you go towards the light of Scrivener, you never go back.” And when it comes to knowing if your draft is final, Jeffrey Blount noted, “A novel is never really finished. It’s abandoned.”

The perennial debate between plotting (i.e., outlining) and pantsing (i.e., flying by the seat of your pants) continued. Natasha Lester: “I have no idea what I’m doing when I sit down to write a book. That’s part of the fun. It keeps me entertained.” Jonathan F. Putnam: “I wish I knew from the beginning who did it.” Fiona Davis: “I know the twist and the ending.” Hazel Gaynor: “I write my book in the order the reader reads the book.” Amanda Geard told us, “I use guidelines vs. an outline,” while Hazel Gaynor had a great anecdote: “My cat moved a scene when a post-it note got stuck to her tail.”

Characters were also a big discussion. Rita Woods: “We’re not telling history. We’re telling the story of a person within history.” Natasha Lester advised, “When choosing POV, I consider ‘who is the best person to tell this story?’” Elizabeth Blackwell reminded us, “Your character doesn’t know how history is going to go.” And Louise Fein suggested, “Give your protagonist helpful skills and interests.” Janyre Tromp: “Think of one metaphor for your main character. Figure out how that relates to what they’re hiding.”

On the topic of characters, authors were asking agents and editors about the ethics and marketability of writing from perspectives other than your own. Editor Melissa Richter: “Mostly we are looking for people who are writing from their own experiences.” Agent Amanda Jain: “A sensitivity read is not a magic wand.”

Other craft topics talks covered included setting (Kelsey James: “Setting is often the first inspiration for me.” Amanda Geard: “I really love writing place as a tie between timelines.” Hope C. Tarr: “A historical saga makes you feel like you’ve been somewhere on vacation.”), tapping into the five senses (Kelsey James: “When people think of taste, they always think of food, but there are other things you can taste, like blood in your mouth.”), subtext (Janyre Tromp: “There are 40 things going on in my head but only one of them comes out of my mouth.”) and flashbacks (Hope C. Tarr: “If you’re relying too much on flashbacks you might not have started your novel in the right place.”).

When it comes to these finer details of honing your craft, Amanda Skenandore reminded us, “Adding nuance is often done best at the revision stage.” And, of course, no 2025 writing craft conversation would be complete without references to Artificial Intelligence. Jeffrey Blount: “I would not like to read a book written by AI.” Agent Ariele Friedman: “Please don’t use ChatGPT to write your book.”

Moving from craft to the state of publishing, speakers on all sides of the business weren’t shy in sharing their opinions. Sarah Penner: “The world of traditional publishing is a complete mess…Publishing is risk averse. They don’t care about quality. They care about making money.” Agent Ariele Friedman: “There are more books to publish and few people [working in publishing] to publish them.” Agent Amanda Jain: “I’m not going to say that traditional publishing is nimble, but it’s a little faster than it used to be.” The impact of #BookTok was also a hot topic. Agent Ariele Friedman: “Self-publishing is for powerhouses right now. If you’re crushing it on TikTok, go for it.”

As usual, there was plenty of chatter about the time periods and subgenres that are currently hot or not. Gill Paul had two pieces of advice when considering the salability of your novel: “You can choose a ‘less fashionable’ time period, if you pair it with a modern timeline [in a dual timeline],” and, “I like linking books to a centenary or other anniversary. It helps with press.” Hope C. Tarr also reminded us, “A tough sell does not mean an impossible sell,” when sharing the story of her novel’s path to publication.

One of the main themes we kept hearing about was genre blending. Agent Ariele Friedman: “Historical plus [another genre] gives you an advantage.” Many speakers focused on historical fantasy or historical fiction with elements of magical realism. Zenobia Neil explained her attraction to this subgenre: “I exist in the non-magical world every day and it’s really a drag,” with Rita Woods expressing a similar sentiment: “There isn’t enough magic in the world.” Vanessa Riley: “You can blend genres to make a bigger story that engulfs you.” Silvia Moreno-Garcia: “The real becomes more real with the inclusion of the fantastic” and, “There need not be an explanation for the fantastic.” For those for whom mixing genres is new, Pat Murphy had some advice: “Dip into historical fantasy by writing a short story—there is a robust market for sci-fi and fantasy stories.”

We also heard about what writers were reading (and not reading!). Janyre Tromp advised that we should, “Read scripts if [we] struggle with dialogue.” Rita Woods noted, “If I read while writing I start channeling the other writer.” And Silvia Moreno-Garcia also cautioned against modelling your style on canonical works: “When you imitate too closely, it has no life.”

There was also discussion around how published authors can best deal with our readers’ responses to our work. Sarah Penner: “Some people will love it, some people will hate it, most people will like it…Grieve in private and don’t burn bridges.” Heather Webb: “You can’t control the expectations readers bring to the page…It gets easier with readers over time.”

Writers also shared about the emotions that come with the ups and downs of a writing career. Sarah Penner: “I deal with imposter syndrome every day. And I didn’t when I worked in finance.” Kris Waldherr: “There are physical and psychological reasons for writer’s block.” The conference was a supportive forum for voicing these feelings. After all, Fiona Davis reminded us that this is not a zero-sum game, and that we shouldn’t be viewing fellow writers as our competition: “We should have, not a scarcity mindset, but an unlimited buffet mindset” (now that’s a Vegas-approved metaphor!).

I’ll wrap up Part One of this roundup, with a quote from Hope C. Tarr: “We’re not here because it’s easy. We’re here because we love it.” As we all fly back to our different cities and countries, I hope we remember this love of writing that unites us. I’m looking forward to listening to the other panels and talks and continuing to enjoy HNS from home. Stay tuned for Part Two!

Want to get or stay in touch post-HNS? Connect with me on Instagram, Facebook, or by tweeting @SVictorianist. And sign up for my monthly email newsletter here. 

Neo-Victorian Voices: The Good Lord Bird, James McBride (2013)

The latest title I’m reviewing as part of Neo-Victorian Voices series, covering novels set in the nineteenth century, but written in the twenty-first, is James McBride’s 2013, National Book Award winner, The Good Lord Bird.

Our memorable protagonist is Henry Shackleford, who’s been born into slavery in the Kansas Territory. In 1857, aged around 12, he is “freed” (read: “kidnapped”) by abolitionist James Brown, who mistakes him for a girl and gives him the nickname, Onion. In the years that follow, Henry/Onion has a front row seat to a violent, dangerous, and pivotal period of American history, which he narrates vividly, and, bizarrely enough, with delicious humor. 

Of the many historical novels I’ve read centering on the institution of American slavery, The Good Lord Bird is the most entertaining. McBride brilliantly dramatizes how Onion is misunderstood, overlooked, and underestimated by the (mainly white) characters around him, in a way that provokes laughter while dealing with the difficult issue of racial prejudice.

I also enjoyed his exploration of the character of James Brown. While I’m not an expert on Brown’s life and crusade, it’s clear that McBride has tried to unpack the complex mix of emotions he might provoke in modern readers by pairing research with imagination in his depiction of this fascinating personality.

I was a little surprised that Onion, who’s dressed as a girl for much of the novel, didn’t experience more harassment and other downsides to living as a woman, but, in some ways, this was a welcome break for me as a reader—many novels depicting black women’s experiences in the era have a heavy emphasis on sexual violence.

Part satire, part military historical, part coming of age narrative, with shades of Mark Twain’s Adventures of Huckleberry Finn (1884), I highly recommend The Good Lord Bird to other readers interested in nineteenth-century America.

What novel should I review next as part of my Neo-Victorian Voices series? Let me know—here, on Facebook, on Instagram, or by tweeting @SVictorianist! Want monthly updates from this blog? Sign up to my email newsletter here.

Neo-Victorian Voices: The Champagne Letters, Kate MacIntosh (2024)

Welcome back to my Neo-Victorian Voices series, where I review books set in the nineteenth century but written in the twenty-first!

Today’s novel is a dual timeline historical that alternates between the perspectives of a present-day American divorcee, who finds herself in Paris after unexpectedly becoming single in her fifties, and the widow behind the Veuve Clicquot champagne house, who writes letters to her great-granddaughter about how she navigated the Napoleonic era as a businesswoman, in a time when the wine industry was almost entirely controlled by men.

MacIntosh’s research into the fascinating life of Barbe Nicole Ponsardin Clicquot is clear. She does a great job fictionalizing Clicquot’s biography and turning it into a digestible story that maintains human interest, even as it covers complex swathes of French history. 

The modern-day storyline, following Natalie, is lighter and even easier to read. Natalie is the quintessential American in Paris, charmed by French fashion, food, and wine, and stumbling through the capital asking everyone she encounters if they speak English. She’s swept up in a romance with a dashing man named Gabriel and connecting with the famous champagne widow, via a book of her letters, within what seems like seconds of stepping off her plane from Chicago, but some fun plot twists keep the story fresh and entertaining. 

Overall, the book left me with the impression that MacIntosh wrote it for readers like Natalie–those in love with the idea of Paris and excited by the effervescence of champagne, even if their grasp of French history and wine is a little loose. We often talk about beach reads, but this is a city break read: I’d recommend it if you’re dreaming of a trip to Paris…or if you’re looking for a summer book club pick that gives you the excuse to break open the bubbles.

What book should I review next as part of my Neo-Victorian Voices series? Let me know—here, on Facebook, on Instagram, or by tweeting @SVictorianist. Want my blog posts delivered straight to your inbox monthly? Sign up to my email newsletter here.

Writers' Questions: Do I Need an Author Website?

It’s been a while since I wrote a blog post in my Writer’s Questions series, covering the most searched questions from fellow writers. Previously, I’ve covered topics as diverse as AI and fiction writers, novel openings, pacing your story, and appearing on podcasts. Today, I’m diving into the subject of writer websites.

Why have a website?

Having a website is a great way to increase your profile and ensure anyone Googling your name has access to the information you want them to have about you.

Who needs a website?

A website is crucial if you’re getting traditionally published or self-publishing your own fiction as you’ll want to directly market to consumers and direct them to your book(s). It is less necessary to have a website if you’re at the querying or submission stages, though, if you have other work to feature (e.g., links to published short stories or essays), you may want to set up a website earlier.

What information should appear on my website?

Your website should include information about your book(s), along with links to where people can purchase. It should also feature a brief biography/about you section and contact information for you and/or your agent. Your website might also include details about upcoming events, links to press/reviews, socail media links, and a book club guide, if you have one.

How can I build a website?

You could hire a pro to build your website, but there are lots of tools out there now that make this largely unnecessary. I personally used Squarespace to set up my author website, www.finolaaustin.com, and found it intuitive, despite not being a web designer.

What costs are associated with maintaining a website?

This will depend on the service(s) you use. I pay annual fees for my website and domain and keep records of these as business expenses. 

What’s the difference between a website and a blog?

Think of your website as a detailed digital business card, while your blog is more of a public-facing journal. Many writers have a blog section of their website, rather than maintaining separate sites. For me, since my Secret Victorianist blog predated the publication of my debut novel and was initially branded without my name (it was a secret!), I chose to keep them separate, though I often link between the two sites.

Let me know what other topics you would like to see my cover as part of my Writers’ Questions series? You can comment below or get in touch, via Instagram, Facebook, or by tweeting @SVictorianist. Want regular updates from this blog? Sign up to my monthly newsletter here.

Neo-Victorian Voices: Victorian Psycho, Virginia Feito (2025)

Realism is as synonymous with nineteenth century-set novels as petticoats and corsets, but Virginia Feito’s 2025 Victorian Psycho isn’t a “realistic” tale of a serial killer governess. 

Instead, the novel, the latest I’m reviewing as part of my Neo-Victorian Voices series, is a sort of historical fever dream of the most gruesome kind, that relies on its period setting, unlikely murderer/protagonist, and vulnerable victims (many of them infants) for its shock value. The result is a highly readable novel that will make you laugh and ask, “did she really go there?” unless, of course, you’re squeamish—in which case, I’d give this one a miss. 

Winifred Notty arrives at Ensor House to act as governess to Drusilla and Andrew Pounds. But don’t be fooled—she’s no Jane Eyre! We quickly learn unsavory details of Winifred’s previous posts and become aware of her violent and unusual appetites, but the real reason she’s now targeting the Pounds family is a later revelation. 

The more “usual” problems of a Victorian governess—e.g., unpleasant charges and a lecherous employer—soon give way to dilemmas like where Winifred should hide the mounting bodies and whether anyone will notice bloodstained baby clothes. The tension at Ensor House ratchets up, leading to a bloodbath of a denouement, timed to coincide with Christmas, of course, and a conclusion reminiscent of my dissertation about nineteenth-century sensation fiction, in which I argued that female characters who “act the part” of the middle-class Victorian heroine can literally get away with murder.

A film adaptation is already in the works and Victorian Psycho definitely reads like it was written with a view to the big screen. As someone who loves both horror movies and the nineteenth century, I’ll definitely be watching, and I’d recommend the book to anyone who sits at the center of this Venn diagram, like me!

What novels should I consider reviewing next as part of my Neo-Victorian Voices series? Let me know—here, on Facebook, on Instagram, or by tweeting @SVictorianist. Want monthly updates from my blog? Sign up for my email newsletter here.

Neo-Victorian Voices: The Swan’s Nest, Laura McNeal (2024)

It’s no secret that I love a book based on real Victorian scandals (after all, I did write a novel about the affair between Branwell Bronte and Lydia Robinson!), so I was excited to read Laura McNeal’s 2024 The Swan’s Nest as part of my Neo-Victorian Voices series, reviewing works set in the nineteenth century, but written in the twenty-first.

The Swan’s Nest tells the story of the relationship between Robert Browning and Elizabeth Barrett, in the lead up to, and early days of, their marriage, set against a backdrop of an English social milieu grappling with the legacy of slavery and exploitation in Jamaica. 

The courtship depicted here is tender, rather than steamy, and much of the novel focuses on side characters (some fictional, some based on real figures). Lovers of historical romance may be disappointed, but McNeal’s prose is enjoyable, and the novel feels well-researched and realistic. 

Barrett’s anxiety over her controlling father’s reaction to her burgeoning relationship and the love of poetry she shares with Browning came across most strongly. The sections dealing with colonialism leaned a little too didactic for my taste and took us away from the central characters but the important topic being explored will engage readers who are learning about the Barretts’ unsavory “business” interests for the first time.

Overall, while The Swan’s Nest is one of the quieter novels I’ve reviewed as part of this series, I would recommend it to anyone with a love for Browning and/or Barrett’s poems, an interest in the history of the British West Indies, or a preference for biographical historical fiction.

Do you have recommendations for what book I should review next as part of my Neo-Victorian Voices series? Let me know—here, on Instagram, on Facebook, or by tweeting @SVictorianist!

Want regular updates from this blog? Sign up to my email newsletter here.

Neo-Victorian Voices: Moonlight and the Pearler’s Daughter, Lizzie Pook (2022)

Welcome back to the Neo-Victorian Voices review series, covering novels set in the nineteenth century, but written in the twenty-first. Today I’m blogging for the first time about a book set in 1800s Australia! The closest I’ve gotten previously was 1800s New Zealand, when reviewing Eleanor Catton’s 2013 The Luminaries back in 2018. 

It’s 1896 in Western Australia when Eliza’s father, the owner of a prominent pearling business, goes missing at sea. She and her family arrived from England ten years previously and have suffered more than their fair share of tragedy since. Now, the tomboyish Eliza is on a mission to find and save her father, as she couldn’t the family members she lost before. 

Pook deftly introduces us to the world of a remote (fictional) Australian town, peopled by diverse immigrants, corrupt authorities, and a mistreated aboriginal population. It’s a vibrant setting of inhospitable landscapes, teeming with fascinating, and dangerous, animal life, such as salties, sharks, and kleptomaniac cockatoos. 

If you read historical fiction to be transported to a different time and place and to learn about past events you might not have been aware of, there’s a lot to enjoy about Moonlight and the Pearler’s Daughter. I relished the insight into the pearl trade and the additional levels of agency possible for a nineteenth-century heroine in an Australian vs. a British, or even an American, setting. Eliza is also an appealing main character, likable without being flawless.

I wish the supporting characters had been a little more developed, especially Axel, Eliza’s will they/won’t they potential love interest, Min, her friend, and the antagonist Parker, who is irredeemably evil. No spoilers here but the revelation of the reason behind the father’s disappearance was also a little underwhelming.

All in, this is an original contribution to the genre and a novel I’d recommend to readers looking to broaden their horizons and follow a nineteenth-century heroine far beyond the drawing room.

What novels should I consider reviewing next as part of my Neo-Victorian Voices series? Let me know—here, on Facebook, on Instagram, or by tweeting @SVictorianist. Want monthly updates about my blogging/writing? Sign up for my email newsletter here.

2024: My Year in Reading—A Retrospect

Happy New Year! After tracking my progress via Goodreads, today, for the fifth year in a row, I’m sharing a retrospect on the books I read in the last year. (Here are the links to check out the 2023, 2022, 2021, and 2020 editions if you’d like to travel back in time!)

In 2024, as in 2023, I read 50 books, an average pace of approximately 50 pages a day. 

My preference for fiction over non-fiction remains clear, with 41 vs. 9 books read. But my non-fiction reading covered topics of particular interest to me, such as art (All the Beauty in the World, Patrick Bringley, and The Art Thief, Michael Finkel), ballet (Turning Pointe, Chloe Angyal), and the nineteenth century (Stranger in the Shogun’s City, Amy Stanley, reviewed here, and The Talented Mrs. Mandelbaum, Margalit Fox), and expanded into less expected areas (e.g., memoirs by Flea, Esmeralda Santiago, and Patricia E. Beattie, and the story of an eighteenth-century naval mutiny, in David Grann’s The Wager).

When it comes to fiction, for the first time in one of these reviews, one contemporary author dominates—I read six (!) novels by Tana French in 2024 and continue to love her work. 

I reviewed three novels as part of my Neo-Victorian Voices series, covering books set in the nineteenth century, but written in the twenty-first: Edward Carey’s Edith Holler, Ami McKay’s The Witches of New York, and Emma Donoghue’s Frog Music. And I also read and blogged about two pieces of nineteenth-century French fiction in translation: Three Tales, Gustave Flaubert, and The Animal, Rachilde. 

My interest in my own genre, historical fiction, remains strong, accounting for 20% of books I read last year. Other strong themes for the year in fiction included witches (The Scandalous Confessions of Lydia Bennet, Witch, Melinda Taub, The Manningtree Witches, A.K. Blakemore, The Witches of New York, Ami McKay, and Weyward, Emilia Hart), ballet (Tiny Pretty Things, Dhonielle Clayton and Sona Charaipotra, and The Dance of the Dolls, Lucy Ashe), and, as ever, books by friends/acquaintances (Marvelous, Molly Greeley, The Last Star Standing, C.G. Twiles, and What's Eating Jackie Oh?, Patricia Park). 

Thirty-five books I read this year were by women, and 15 by men, which is slightly more gender-balanced than in 2023. 

In 2025, I’ll again be aiming to read 50 books. My reading resolutions? Continue to embrace the unexpected (one of my favorite 2024 reads was Chelsea G. Summers’s A Certain Hunger, a book about a female cannibal!), prioritize joy in reading, and continue to support writer friends. 

What books did you enjoy reading in 2024 that I should continue adding to my list? Let me know—here, on Facebook, on Instagram, or by tweeting @SVictorianist. Want to stay in touch? Sign up to my monthly email newsletter here.