This small collection of short stories, linked by their
retelling at a dinner party gathered under gruesome circumstances, is an eerie
read. Dumas’s novella is about points of crossover – between life and death,
science and superstition, the body and the soul, reality and fiction. Heads
roll but continue talking, a vampire pierces his victim at night, criminals
return to hang the hangman. Dumas begins (and ends) matter-of-fact-ly - the
narrator is none other than the writer himself. What is terrifying is the
commonness of these tales, despite their strangeness.
The guillotine |
For the general reader: This isn’t gripping from page one,
but the relatively slow opening is soon succeeded by an array of memorable and
haunting stories once the scene is set. The intrusion of murder into the
everyday is sudden and startling, and the initial, almost detective story opening,
is replaced by a world in which nothing is certain and there are more questions
than answers. Little is wrapped up, and while the guests may pose questions
about the nature of existence, they certainly come to no conclusions. I found
this gory enough to still be effective in a somewhat desensitised age. Highly
recommended (if not for bedtime reading!).
For students: As well as (obviously) appealing to anyone
with an interest in the Gothic, the novella is also an interesting example of
literary responses to the French revolution, with its preoccupations with the guillotine,
political intrigue and the lingering effects of national violence. Its
viscerality (an eight year old drowning in the trough of blood at the Place de
la Révolution, a worker being dragged into quicklime by the bodies of kings
excavated from their graves) is in stark contrast to Dickens’s A Tale of Two Cities (1859), which also
deals with the threat of execution. The narrative technique employed for the
dinner party stories reminded me of Wells’s (later) The Time Machine (1895), where occasional returns to the ‘real’
setting suddenly catapult the reader back to the ‘present’ in the same way. It
could also be interesting to consider how the narration is gendered. The final
story (and only one narrated by a female character, the pale and listless
Hedwige) is very distinct from the others in style, with Hedwige’s ordeal
recalling those of many virgins in Gothic fiction, and her slower pacing
reminiscent of Ann Radcliffe’s style of suspense.
Which lesser-known work of nineteenth-century literature
should The Secret Victorianist review next? Let me know here, on Twitter
(@SVictorianist) or on Facebook!
No comments:
Post a Comment