The Victorian stage |
For better or for worse, Henry James is hard.
His novels aren’t the kind of books you can doze off while reading and still
have a pretty accurate awareness of what’s going on. That’s fine – improving,
character building - but coupled with the fact that all I had heard about his
1889-1890 The Tragic Muse was that a)
it was one of his least acclaimed works, b) the novel was linked to his
disastrous attempt to succeed in the theatre, and c) the plot revolved around
two artists’ creative struggles, I have to admit that I wasn’t overly hopeful
about the level of enjoyment I was going to derive from this one.
I was very wrong. Okay, I still didn’t fly
through this at the pace at which I can devour Braddon, Dickens and Collins but
The Tragic Muse was well-constructed,
engaging and eminently enjoyable – here’s why.
For general readers: Nick Dormer
(one of the aforementioned artists) is a character who faces the Victorian
equivalent of a First World Problem. His family expects and assumes he will be
an eminent politician (like his late father), while he wants to devote his life
to art, specifically portrait painting. The novel deals with some of the
fallout from this clash – and from Nick’s ‘double nature’, which sees him
responding to elements of each potential lifestyle and career path. This
fallout isn’t dramatic – this isn’t the stuff of divorce courts, murder
attempts and bigamy trials – but it’s exquisitely realised from multiple
perspectives. There is Nick himself, burdened with responsibility but with an
agency not granted to his female relations. There is his long-suffering mother,
reduced to living largely off others and begging her son to appease her. And
there are his sisters – one totally unlike Nick and unable to understand his
position, the other akin to him in spirit, but limited by her gender.
And that’s just one strand of the plot. In a
novel with over 50 named characters, James allows you to appreciate, even
fleetingly, almost everyone’s point of view. This comes out most impressively
in his complex multi-speaker dialogues, which feel real, and in his pivotal
duologues, which also pack an emotional punch. Nick’s proposal to his rich
widowed cousin Julia is one of the most finely balanced chapters I’ve
encountered in nineteenth-century literature and demonstrates an understanding
of humans as thinking, feeling and social animals which any reader will respond
to.
For students: Some critics
have called The Tragic Muse
un-Jamesian. I don’t agree that it is, as it shares the same social concerns
and the same methods of inspection that you come to expect from James’s most
popular novels, but it certainly has points of difference from James’s other
novels, which are worthy of comment. For a start, James strays away here from
one of his favourite themes – the differences between the English and
Americans. The novel is entirely European, as it begins in Paris and is largely
set in London (with one character enjoying a jaunt to the colonies). Miriam
Rooth – the actress who is the tragic muse herself – has Jewish heritage, but
this is not explored in detail.
The interest with the theatre is also
idiosyncratic and is, no doubt, one of the biggest reasons students may choose
to read the novel. As well as casting light on James’s personal experiences
with the art form, the novel is interesting because Miriam joins a raft of
other fictional actresses and performers in the period (e.g. I’ve writtenpreviously on Bianca in Geraldine Jewsbury’s The Half Sisters and Miriam, as active artist, may be a neat point
of comparison with George du Maurier’s passive and eponymous Trilby). Nick’s
cousin Peter is an important character whose views on whether or not Miriam is
marriageable while she remains on the stage, could well inform historical
studies on the respectability of actresses (who often retired upon marriage) in
the period.
I'm reading it properly for the first time and find it a very solid novel, with attractive characters. The situation between Nick and Julia is not just about his temptation to art but also has a gay aspect -- Julia keeps referring to that "dreadful" Gabriel Nash, who is much more a portrait of Wilde than I expected, and shows that James was quite in attunement with Wilde, contrary to his initial hostility when he first met Wilde in the USA in 1882.
ReplyDeleteI'm reading it properly for the first time and find it a very solid novel, with attractive characters. The situation between Nick and Julia is not just about his temptation to art but also has a gay aspect -- Julia keeps referring to that "dreadful" Gabriel Nash, who is much more a portrait of Wilde than I expected, and shows that James was quite in attunement with Wilde, contrary to his initial hostility when he first met Wilde in the USA in 1882.
ReplyDelete