When you think of plastic surgery
an image may spring to mind—of heavily botoxed celebrities, or subway
commercials for breast enlargements, or Rachel Green pre and post nose job. But
Cristin O’Keefe Aptowicz’s engrossing biography of nineteenth-century surgeon, and
a plastic surgery pioneer, Thomas Dent Mütter may make
you think of the practice entirely differently.
Cristin O’Keefe Aptowicz (1978-) |
Mütter (1811-1859)
lived in a time when those with ‘deformities’ were outcasts, when birth defects
that are fixable today (e.g. cleft palates) determined the course of your
entire life, when burns victims were ‘monsters’, kept hidden away from the
world by their ashamed families, when terrible conditions in match factories
led to ‘phossy jaw’—working class women suffering from painful abscesses,
potential brain damage and, ultimately, if left untreated, death.
And he brought them comfort. Mütter’s skill and surgical innovations transformed and saved the
lives of many. He removed horns and unsightly tumours. He let burns victims
turn their heads (and face society) again. He developed so-called Mütter flap surgery, a
technique that survives until today, where flaps of skin remain partially
attached to one area, while being grafted onto another, ensuring the body does
not reject them.
How Mütter transformed the lives of burns victims |
Aptowicz gives us Mütter the ambidextrous maverick, Mütter the innovator, who had the foresight to believe in the
importance of hygiene in the surgery room and the crucial nature of patient
pre- and post-operative care, and Mütter the teacher—he was the Chair of Surgery at Philadelphia’s Jefferson
Medical College (now Thomas Jefferson University) from 1841 until 1856, when
poor health expiated his retirement.
But she also gives us Mütter the orphan, who made his way to Paris with very little money
to learn from the century’s best physicians, Mütter the dandy, who always had a weakness for extravagant dress,
and Mütter the
collector, whose lifetime’s store of specimens and oddities went on to form the
basis of the museum that now bears his name.
A woman suffering from 'phossy jaw' |
Mütter’s story,
and the history of medicine more generally, is revealing of many aspects of
nineteenth-century American culture. There is, of course, the backdrop of racial
tensions and impending civil war (his students would go on to be physicians on the battlefield on both
sides of the conflict). There are the attitudes towards women—excluded from the
medical establishment, while obstetrics is one of its most important branches,
due to the high levels of maternal, and even higher levels of infant, mortality
at the time. There’s a particularly gruelling section dealing with the
realities of nineteenth-century abortion, and the case of Eliza Sowers, which
would go on to have huge ramifications for the legal debate around termination
and the ‘personhood’ of the foetus.
To contrast with Mütter, Aptowicz spends a lot of time delving into the life and
opinions of his fellow lecturer Charles D. Meigs, Chair of Obstetrics at
Jefferson College, who was staunchly conservative in his views. Unlike Mütter, Meigs refused to
recognise the role doctors might play in contagion, even as his patients were
dying from outbreaks of puerperal fever and his industry peers started to posit
theories that would be proven by the advent of microbiology. Meigs also opposed
the use of ether, the first anaesthetic (while Mütter was the first to use it for an operation in Philadelphia).
He preferred to operate on his patients without any form of pain relief and
delivered babies without it, even as women begged for relieving gas, as he saw
labouring pains as a God-given trial for his female patients.
Thomas Dent Mütter |
Aptowicz’s biography could have come off as macabre and
voyeuristic, the literary equivalent of a nineteenth-century freak show, but
throughout she remains true to the humanity of her subjects, using the same
care with which Mütter treated his
samples, which he often ‘saved’ from being seen as horrors to form part of his
educational collection. But it’s a shame she hasn’t more information to delve
into about Mütter’s personal
life. While his views on medicine, and his personality as a teacher, come alive
throughout, his relationships, especially with his wife Mary, are still
shrouded in obscurity.
Mütter died when
he was forty-seven but his life had a profound effect on the medical establishment,
his patients, his students and Philadelphia. ‘Ambition…is like the sun,’ he wrote. ‘It gives life and heat to all around.’ Aptowicz’s work shows us
just how far ambition (if you were an educated white man) could take you in
nineteenth-century America, in spite of poverty, ill health and bad luck, and
how much we owe to pioneering doctors like Mütter in medical practice today.
What would you like to see the Secret Victorianist read next? Let
me know—here, on Facebook or by tweeting @SVictorianist.
No comments:
Post a Comment