I first read Susan Hill’s The Woman in Black (1983) as a child
when I came across the book in my local library. I’d recently “discovered”
Victorian literature and had been reading lots of Brontë and Dickens. The cover
first attracted me (I was already drawn to a Gothic aesthetic!) and, funny
enough for someone who would go on to become a historical novelist, I was
little disappointed when I realised this wasn’t a “real” nineteenth-century
novel but a work from the previous decade.
Since then, I’ve experienced the
story several times in different media. There was a touring production of the
popular stage adaptation, which I attended at Belfast Opera House with giggling
teenage classmates. We screamed at the jump scares and I marvelled at the stage
effects (I’d never seen a Broadway or West End show before and loved the
lighting and use of translucent curtains). When I was at university, I saw
the 2012 film adaptation starring Daniel Radcliffe. A friend’s girlfriend
covered her eyes for most of the movie and deemed it a horror film.
Each time, varied as these
experiences were, my response has been the same. The Woman in Black has more style than substance. It’s Victoriana
for those who don’t know much about the Victorians. But it’s all in good fun
and can be visually compelling—just as the novel’s cover was to me many years
ago.
This week I attended another
production of the stage play, this time at the McKittirick Hotel in Manhattan. The
McKittirick isn’t a real hotel but a performance space with drinking and dining
venues. It’s also home to Sleep No More,
the most popular immersive theatre experience in the city. I was excited to see
what they would do with The Woman in
Black.
What I didn’t expect was that,
while Brits revel in how Victorian The Woman in Black is (from creepy music
boxes, to face-obscuring fashions to ponies and traps), Americans really
respond to the story’s Britishness.
Prior to the show, attendees can dine in booths designed to resemble those of
an English pub. We ate pies and drank ale. There was even HP Sauce on the
table, which seemed pretty un-Victorian, until I read up on it and realised
that the brand dates from 1895. The performance space also includes a bar, hence
the billing of this The Woman in Black
as a “ghost play in a pub.”
Slightly disappointingly, these
pre-show bells and whistles, reminiscent of the pie dinner I enjoyed prior to
the Barrow Street Theatre’s production of Sweeney
Todd a couple of years ago, were the most innovative part of the
production. Otherwise the play will be familiar to those who’ve seen it at
other venues, despite the McKittirick’s fabled reputation.
There are only three actors (and
one is the unspeaking ghost). Some props and even a dog are make-believe, with
the script rhapsodising on the power of audiences’ imaginations. It’s all very
meta and the Gothic tropes (empty rocking chairs, abandoned toys, descending
mist) are so hackneyed they verge on cliché.
I ended the night with the same feeling
The Woman in Black has always left me
with—disappointment that I didn’t enjoy it more, given my love of Victorian
Gothic, but also some satisfaction that the period of literature I’m most
fascinated by continues to have such mass appeal. There’s something about the
preoccupations, fashions, and stories of the nineteenth century that audiences
keep coming back to—and that’s great news for a historical novelist like me.
If you’re looking for a fun night
out and like your pie, consider checking out the production at the McKittirick.
But at $100+ for the whole experience, I’d caution against breaking the bank to
attend.
What NYC-based theatre production
would you like to see the Secret Victorianist review next? Let me know—here, on
Facebook, or by tweeting @SVictorianist.
If you want to learn more about
my debut novel, Brontë’s Mistress, check out my website here. Historical novelist
Jeanne Mackin writes, “Anyone
who has ever thrilled to a Brontë novel needs to read this glorious historical
novel about the Brontë sisters and their brother, Branwell, and his affair with
the outrageous, scandalous woman who broke all conventions.”
No comments:
Post a Comment