The Historical Novel Society North America 2025 in Quotes: Part Two

Back in June, I spent a wonderful weekend in Las Vegas for my third in-person Historical Novel Society North America Conference. I recapped some of the quotable takeaways from fellow historical novelists in my Part One blog post, which I wrote on the plane on the way home. 

Dressed as Miss Havisham for the costume contest

But one of the best things about HNSNA is that the conference isn’t over once we all return to our respective cities. Since we waved goodbye to Vegas, I’ve been working my way through the recordings of the panels and talks I didn’t hear live. Today, in my Part Two post, I’m highlighting some of the most memorable moments.

I was particularly excited to catch up on the session on biographical fiction, which dwelt on the challenges of this sub-genre (Gill Paul: “Part of the problem with biographical fiction is what you have to leave out”), as well as the ways writing about a real person can provide the author with helpful scaffolding (Heather Webb: “In biographical fiction you have a map—the person’s life”). In other sessions, though, the historical fiction community remained divided on the question of outlining vs. “pantsing.” Renee Rosen told us, “I can’t outline. I work everything out on the page.”

Speaking of maps, Christopher Cevasco gave us a spirited defense of starting your novel with a map and a prologue, gifting us this great analogy: “If we compare reading a novel to fine dining, the map is like the menu, and the prologue is like an appetizer.”

As usual, there was plenty of research chatter. Tracy Barrett warned that, “it’s easy to fall prey to research rapture,” and Jonathan F. Putnam noted that “your family history doesn’t necessarily have intrinsic interest to a stranger.” Just like our keynote authors, other speakers emphasized research gaps as pivotal to the novelist’s process. G.J. Berger: “The further you go back in time, the more you can make it up.” Shelley Blanton-Stroud: “We chase facts but more importantly we chase truth.” And Alan Smale said of the alternate history genre, “[it] holds up a mirror to our known timeline.”

One of my favorite craft tips came from Gill Paul, who advised us to, “write your most emotional scene in first person, then switch it to third,” if you’re writing a close third person perspective. Other suggestions related to characterization included those from Judith Lindbergh (“You want to take pauses in an action scene to reach into your character’s emotional state”), Elizabeth Boyle (“The archetype gives a character a place in the story and a role to fulfil”), and Kate Quinn (“If the antagonist is going to be a true threat to your hero, then they can’t be a dumbass”). 

During a session on getting “unstuck,” Susan Meissner told us, “If you’re really stuck go back to your premise and realign yourself with it, because it’s where you began. It’s the heart of your story that gave you to gas to begin,” while Eliza Knight made a helpful distinction between abandoning and taking distance from a project: “Don’t let it go. Set it aside.”

In discussions around writing characters who are part of historically marginalized groups, Samantha Rajaram told the crowd, “We are more than our queerness, so we need to make sure we’re not flattening our characters out and reducing them.” While Joan Fernandez reminded listeners that, “language is our currency in writing, and just because a phrase was in common use it doesn’t mean that we automatically use it.”

Finally, the “market” and the salability of our passion projects remains top-of-mind for many conference speakers and question askers. Tracee de Hahn suggested that we all, “evaluate [our] log lines even if [we] started from a family story,” while Weina Dai Randel left us with two options: “When it comes to trends you can try to chase them, or you can keep being the writer you are.”

Thank you so much to all the speakers at HNSNA 2025—if I owned a time turner, I would have listened to all of you live in Vegas. Here’s looking forward to the UK society conference, which will be in Maynooth in Ireland in 2026!

Want monthly email updates on my blog and writing? Sign up to my newsletter here. And please stay in touch on Instagram, Facebook, or by tweeting @SVictorianist.

The Historical Novel Society North America 2025 in Quotes: Part One

Yesterday I returned home from my third in-person Historical Novel Society North America (HNSNA) conference and my sixth HNS conference overall. This time the conference took place in Las Vegas! As I’ve done at the last few conferences, I’m sharing some of the favorite quotes I heard from fellow authors and a handful of publishing professionals over the last few days. A Part Two post will follow when I’ve had a chance to listen to the recordings of the sessions that I did not attend IRL.

Reporting from #HNS2025!

As usual, research continued to be a hot topic among the historical fiction community, with many writers sharing their go-to resources.  Jennifer S. Brown: “When I’m stuck, I dive into historical newspapers and magazines and see what was going on in the world.” Amanda Skenandore: “Old travel guides can be a treasure trove.” Judith Starkston: “Travel is the best kind of research.”

But Special Guest Silvia Moreno-Garcia urged us to consider oral history in addition to classic archival and library research: “Oral history paired with research can be a valuable foundation for your book.” She also shared that, “An erroneous memory can be more interesting than a real one. We must understand the lie and the truth inside it.” Spotlight Author Jeffrey Blount had a similar perspective: “The best writing advice I’ve ever received is, ‘listen.’”

Special Guest Fiona Davis also had helpful advice about some of the pitfalls of researching, suggesting we, “Keep meticulous records of the materials that helped shape your novel.” She also talked about how we can get lost in our research: “I can pack in too much research and have to strip it out.” Meanwhile, A.M. Stuart had a helpful reminder that we’re writing about historical fiction rather than history: “I’m not writing non-fiction. I make things up.”

Drafting was also a hot topic, with Kelsey James telling us, “It’s important to have momentum when drafting,” and Spotlight Author Sarah Penner keeping her advice straightforward: “Finish the book.” Hazel Gaynor touched on the software we’re using to draft: “I’ve heard that if you go towards the light of Scrivener, you never go back.” And when it comes to knowing if your draft is final, Jeffrey Blount noted, “A novel is never really finished. It’s abandoned.”

The perennial debate between plotting (i.e., outlining) and pantsing (i.e., flying by the seat of your pants) continued. Natasha Lester: “I have no idea what I’m doing when I sit down to write a book. That’s part of the fun. It keeps me entertained.” Jonathan F. Putnam: “I wish I knew from the beginning who did it.” Fiona Davis: “I know the twist and the ending.” Hazel Gaynor: “I write my book in the order the reader reads the book.” Amanda Geard told us, “I use guidelines vs. an outline,” while Hazel Gaynor had a great anecdote: “My cat moved a scene when a post-it note got stuck to her tail.”

Characters were also a big discussion. Rita Woods: “We’re not telling history. We’re telling the story of a person within history.” Natasha Lester advised, “When choosing POV, I consider ‘who is the best person to tell this story?’” Elizabeth Blackwell reminded us, “Your character doesn’t know how history is going to go.” And Louise Fein suggested, “Give your protagonist helpful skills and interests.” Janyre Tromp: “Think of one metaphor for your main character. Figure out how that relates to what they’re hiding.”

On the topic of characters, authors were asking agents and editors about the ethics and marketability of writing from perspectives other than your own. Editor Melissa Richter: “Mostly we are looking for people who are writing from their own experiences.” Agent Amanda Jain: “A sensitivity read is not a magic wand.”

Other craft topics talks covered included setting (Kelsey James: “Setting is often the first inspiration for me.” Amanda Geard: “I really love writing place as a tie between timelines.” Hope C. Tarr: “A historical saga makes you feel like you’ve been somewhere on vacation.”), tapping into the five senses (Kelsey James: “When people think of taste, they always think of food, but there are other things you can taste, like blood in your mouth.”), subtext (Janyre Tromp: “There are 40 things going on in my head but only one of them comes out of my mouth.”) and flashbacks (Hope C. Tarr: “If you’re relying too much on flashbacks you might not have started your novel in the right place.”).

When it comes to these finer details of honing your craft, Amanda Skenandore reminded us, “Adding nuance is often done best at the revision stage.” And, of course, no 2025 writing craft conversation would be complete without references to Artificial Intelligence. Jeffrey Blount: “I would not like to read a book written by AI.” Agent Ariele Friedman: “Please don’t use ChatGPT to write your book.”

Moving from craft to the state of publishing, speakers on all sides of the business weren’t shy in sharing their opinions. Sarah Penner: “The world of traditional publishing is a complete mess…Publishing is risk averse. They don’t care about quality. They care about making money.” Agent Ariele Friedman: “There are more books to publish and few people [working in publishing] to publish them.” Agent Amanda Jain: “I’m not going to say that traditional publishing is nimble, but it’s a little faster than it used to be.” The impact of #BookTok was also a hot topic. Agent Ariele Friedman: “Self-publishing is for powerhouses right now. If you’re crushing it on TikTok, go for it.”

As usual, there was plenty of chatter about the time periods and subgenres that are currently hot or not. Gill Paul had two pieces of advice when considering the salability of your novel: “You can choose a ‘less fashionable’ time period, if you pair it with a modern timeline [in a dual timeline],” and, “I like linking books to a centenary or other anniversary. It helps with press.” Hope C. Tarr also reminded us, “A tough sell does not mean an impossible sell,” when sharing the story of her novel’s path to publication.

One of the main themes we kept hearing about was genre blending. Agent Ariele Friedman: “Historical plus [another genre] gives you an advantage.” Many speakers focused on historical fantasy or historical fiction with elements of magical realism. Zenobia Neil explained her attraction to this subgenre: “I exist in the non-magical world every day and it’s really a drag,” with Rita Woods expressing a similar sentiment: “There isn’t enough magic in the world.” Vanessa Riley: “You can blend genres to make a bigger story that engulfs you.” Silvia Moreno-Garcia: “The real becomes more real with the inclusion of the fantastic” and, “There need not be an explanation for the fantastic.” For those for whom mixing genres is new, Pat Murphy had some advice: “Dip into historical fantasy by writing a short story—there is a robust market for sci-fi and fantasy stories.”

We also heard about what writers were reading (and not reading!). Janyre Tromp advised that we should, “Read scripts if [we] struggle with dialogue.” Rita Woods noted, “If I read while writing I start channeling the other writer.” And Silvia Moreno-Garcia also cautioned against modelling your style on canonical works: “When you imitate too closely, it has no life.”

There was also discussion around how published authors can best deal with our readers’ responses to our work. Sarah Penner: “Some people will love it, some people will hate it, most people will like it…Grieve in private and don’t burn bridges.” Heather Webb: “You can’t control the expectations readers bring to the page…It gets easier with readers over time.”

Writers also shared about the emotions that come with the ups and downs of a writing career. Sarah Penner: “I deal with imposter syndrome every day. And I didn’t when I worked in finance.” Kris Waldherr: “There are physical and psychological reasons for writer’s block.” The conference was a supportive forum for voicing these feelings. After all, Fiona Davis reminded us that this is not a zero-sum game, and that we shouldn’t be viewing fellow writers as our competition: “We should have, not a scarcity mindset, but an unlimited buffet mindset” (now that’s a Vegas-approved metaphor!).

I’ll wrap up Part One of this roundup, with a quote from Hope C. Tarr: “We’re not here because it’s easy. We’re here because we love it.” As we all fly back to our different cities and countries, I hope we remember this love of writing that unites us. I’m looking forward to listening to the other panels and talks and continuing to enjoy HNS from home. Stay tuned for Part Two!

Want to get or stay in touch post-HNS? Connect with me on Instagram, Facebook, or by tweeting @SVictorianist. And sign up for my monthly email newsletter here. 

Opera Review: Rigoletto, The Metropolitan Opera, New York City

George Gagnidze as Rigoletto

Giuseppe Verdi’s tragic opera about a debauched duke, his deformed jester, and the hunchback’s beautiful daughter, based on a Victor Hugo play, was first performed in Venice in 1851.

Michael Mayer’s energetic production at the Met (now in performance for the third time) transports the action from sixteenth-century Mantua to 1960s Las Vegas. Expect neon lights, a casino, and a seedy strip club, with the duke (Stephen Costello) a flamboyant playboy, who, in the first act, is set upon by an Arab tycoon (Stefan Szkafarowsky) for seducing his daughter.

Olga Peretyatko and Stephen Costello

The sixties is a clever choice of time period. It is an opportunity for colourful set (Christine Jones) and costume (Susan Hilferty) design, but also, strangely, makes sense. The tension between a highly sexed, drunken lifestyle and the more conservative morality Gilda (Olga Peretyatko) represents rings true, as does the physical threat of violence from Stefan Kocan’s mobster-style assassin.

George Gagnidze is Rigoletto himself, bringing gravitas to a production that leans to the humorous, especially due to the loose and amusing translation of the English subtitles. He is particularly touching in his scenes with his daughter, before and after her deflowering, but also does a good job in scenes with the Duke’s entourage, holding our attention throughout the flashing lights and dramatic dance sequences.

Olga Peretyatko

It’s the Duke’s ‘La donna è mobile’ that the audience leaves humming (of course!) but, in the final act, there’s a real pathos in the juxtaposition between Costello’s lighthearted singing and the moment of tragedy – as Gilda’s body is revealed (inside the trunk of a car here, not a sack).

I was entertained throughout, with the three hour running time flying by. There are performances until 17^th December, so if you’re in the city (and even if you’re a newbie to opera), go!

Do you know of any other shows with nineteenth-century origins currently playing in New York? Let me know – here, on Facebook or by tweeting @SVictorianist.